The New World Order: A Colonial Vision for the Middle East
The recent developments in the Middle East have revealed a clear pattern of colonial and imperial ambitions, driven by a combination of political and material interests. This vision, which seeks to reshape the region according to Western needs, has its roots in the strategies of key figures who have played significant roles in shaping the current geopolitical landscape.
One such figure is Robert Dermer, an Israeli strategist and enforcer for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Dermer’s approach is centered on the idea that the Arab population must be “transformatively” recalibrated to align with Israeli interests. His philosophy suggests that the Arabs should be broken into pieces, leaving them with no choice but to accept the dominance of their conquerors. This concept was echoed in a document released by former US President Donald Trump on September 29, known as “Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza.”
This plan reflects a mindset rooted in colonialism, where the question of control over vast oil reserves becomes central. The underlying assumption is that these resources do not belong to the Arab tribes living in the region. Instead, they are seen as assets to be controlled by external powers, particularly European Jews who seek to settle in Palestine. For this to happen, the Palestinians must either be removed or coerced into accepting an apartheid-like situation.
The Role of Key Figures
Among the key players in this narrative is former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, often referred to as a “snake in the grass.” Blair introduced the idea of “acceptance of reality,” which became a cornerstone of the strategy to subjugate the Palestinian population. His influence can be seen in the 20-point plan, particularly in the section that emphasizes inter-religious dialogue to change the narratives of both Palestinians and Israelis.
Another influential figure is Jared Kushner, Trump’s Jewish son-in-law. He runs a foundation that funds Jewish settlers in the West Bank, aiming to remove Palestinians from Gaza and sell the land to developers. Kushner’s remarks about not allowing Arabs to return reflect a broader strategy of displacement and control.
The 20-Point Plan and Its Implications
The first sentence of Trump’s 20-point plan states that “Gaza will be a de-radicalized, terrorism-free zone that will not oppose a threat to its neighbors (Israel).” This language directly aligns with Dermer’s strategies. Item 18 of the plan emphasizes the need for inter-religious dialogue to foster peace and coexistence. However, this approach seems to ignore the real suffering of individuals like Amar, a nine-year-old boy whose family was bombed out, and an Arab girl who survived the destruction of her entire family.
The plan also includes provisions for Hamas members to receive amnesty if they commit to peaceful co-existence and dismantle their weapons. However, it remains unclear how this process will affect the ongoing presence of Israeli forces in the region. The term “gradually” in the plan is particularly concerning, as it could mean years of occupation under the guise of peace.
The Return of Tony Blair
Blair’s potential role as the high commissioner for Gaza has raised eyebrows. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has criticized Blair, accusing him of working with the Israeli lobby to undermine his leadership. Corbyn argues that Blair’s past actions, including his role in the Iraq War, make him unfit to be involved in Middle Eastern affairs.
Blair’s belief in the benefits of imperialism is evident in his desire to repeat the “experience” of colonial rule. This perspective is troubling, especially when considering the devastation caused by previous interventions. The idea that the Palestinians cannot govern themselves is not only dismissive but also ignores the agency of the local population.
The Final Decision
Trump’s plan did not consult Hamas or the Palestinians, instead giving them three days to accept his proposal. If they refuse, the US will provide Netanyahu with weapons of mass destruction to “finish the job.” This ultimatum highlights the power dynamics at play, where the voices of the affected population are ignored in favor of external agendas.
